Avid readers of Professional Pensions may have seen an ariticle in the 6th September edition regarding the case of Waddy v Foster Wheeler (yes, THAT Foster Wheeler – just can’t seem to keep out of the pension press can it??). I was asked to comment on the case just as I was rising from a Magistrates’ court sitting so I’m not sure my thoughts were fully cogent at the time!!
Posts under ‘Pension legislation’
It’s just potty…
Slightly hidden away in the bowels of the Daily Telegraph comment section is a piece about Wedgwood Potteries. Sadly this wonderful British institution has faced financial difficulties in recent years and as a result, the pension scheme has had to go into the Pension Protection Fund in order to be rescued. So far so sadly usual.
But the Wedgwood Scheme was a multi employer scheme and one of the employers was the Wedgwood Museum in Stoke on Trent – completely independent of the pottery company itself but with 5 employees who were members of the main scheme. So the Museum became a participating employer as it was required to be. And this is where the whole things becomes a bit unfortunate.
A is for Apple, B is for Ball….
Now we all know that pensions are difficult. That’s why my clients pay me very reasonable fees to sort it out for them. The National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) have just published their research paper showing that its target audiences don’t understand many of the terms and phrases used by the pension industry and have produced a ‘phrasebook’ to help raise levels of understanding. I don’t know how much they paid for that piece of research but I (and any one else involved in pensions) could have told them that for free!!
New Year Predictions 2011
Last year dear readers you will recall that I made a few not very serious pension predictions for the year to come. As this will be my last blog for 2010, I thought why not do it again so here goes:
1 The Parliamentary pension scheme for MPs will be scrapped in favour of auto enrolment into NEST.
2. NEST will be abolished 6 months later after MPs suddenly decide that it is really not that great an idea after all and can we please have our nice DB scheme back again.
No one said it would be easy…
Now that the dust has settled a bit on the excitement of the Auto Enrolment announcements of last week, I thought I might just sit down and try to understand a little bit more about what the proposals might actually mean in practice, particularly for small to medium sized businesses. I’m not addressing the really small employers here – those with just a few employees and who previously provided no pension provision. Yes, it’s true that they will for the first time have to look at this, but generally, they will probably just auto enrol into NEST and be done with it.
The Price We Pay
Well, the Gods have spoken and we have a slightly better idea (but not by much) on how the Spending Review will impact on pensions. The main point to arise so far concerns the not totally unexpected rise in State Pension Age to 66 by 2020.
This will have a far greater impact on women than men, in that female SPA will rise steeply from 60 to 65 from 2016 to 2018 and then both male and female SPA will rise to 66 by 2020. By the way, there is a highly amusing typo in the Spending Review document at page 69 where the Treasury officials seem unable to spell ‘equalisation’ correctly. Edukashun eh??
Summertime Blues
Just a short one this week in that I was interviewed by Lexis/Nexis the legal database, for commentary on St Vince of Cable’s plan to simplify legislation by ensuring a One In One Out approach. Here’s a link to the article. Call me an old cynic if you like but sometimes a glass half empty is exactly that. I’m off on my hols now for a couple of weeks. Lying on a beach in the Caribbean with a good friend, good food and a tall glass of something naughty. Now that glass will certainly be half full! See you in September.
Who’d have thought it…?
Although it is really something of a statement of the bleedin’ obvious, PwC have recently issued a report which after extensive (and no doubt extremely expensive) research has concluded that Final Salary Pension Schemes will have ceased to exist within 10 years. This is not exactly ground breaking news to those of us within the Pension Industry who have been watching the death throes for several years now.
That’s Fuggin Brilliant…
Best news story of the week has to be Mohammed Fayed’s rant at the Harrods Pension Scheme Trustees for not allowing him to ‘raid’ the scheme of his company dividend before paying up for the deficit as the law requires. The full report in the Evening Standard is simply hilarious. I was convinced at first that it had been written by Ian Hislop. The shareholdings in Harrods are opaque in the extreme as any reader of Private Eye will know, with various offshore ‘Fayed Family Trusts’ hiding most of the true picture.
They do things differently up there…
Been a bit quiet on the pension front this week – must be something to do with some vote thingy going on in the country. Pensions seem pretty low on the politicians agenda (it’s that ‘too difficult’ basket again) so I thought this week I’d actually blog about a bit of law (shock horror!!)
The Outer House Court of Session (it’s a Scottish court for all you Sassenachs) has put the boot into the English once again over of all things, the equalisation of pension rights in schemes.
Jennie advises large multi-employer schemes as well as smaller single employer arrangements and has wide experience of both Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit schemes. Jennie qualified in 1986 originally as a criminal prosecutor. She sits as a Magistrate in her local justice area and is an Approved Chairman and Deputy Chair of the Bench Training and Development Committee. Jennie was formerly Legal Director of the Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority. When her busy practice allows, Jennie likes to indulge her passion for travelling. To consult Jennie on any corporate Pensions matter, please call her on +44 (0)20 7749 2700 or send her an email by clicking below: